Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The PuLi Hotel and Spa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Coolperson177 (talk) 00:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

The PuLi Hotel and Spa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

The PuLi Hotel and Spa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is using Wikipedia for advertisement. It clearly does not comply with WP:NCORP or WP:NGEO. Gentleman wiki (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Gentleman wiki (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Gentleman wiki (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. I added a "Hygienic issues" section translated from the Chinese Wikipedia. The article is much less of an advertisement now that it includes the sanitation scandal. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. No longer promotional thanks to expansion by Eastmain. NemesisAT (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Keep - has been improved significantly since nomination, also has a full review in The Daily Telegraph, which is major WP:RS Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:20, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Keep mostly per the work done during this discussion. See some additional sourcing, which I'll try to get to during the course of this AfD. Star Mississippi 20:54, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.